Easley uses gay slur to praise Clinton

Yesterday Mike Easley endorsed Hillary Clinton. No surprise there, since like her, he is a "right of center" Democrat. What did stand out was in the course of his endorsement he decides to praise her while using a gay slur.

...nothing I love more than a strong powerful woman." Easley concluded his remarks saying Clinton -- "makes Rocky Balboa look like a pansy".

Clinton seemed to see nothing amiss with this remark, but then that is also not surprising to me. For the record:

1) Only bigots use words like "pansy", specifically bigots who are frightfully insecure about their own sexuality and have to denigrate others with childish taunts to feel good.

2) "Rocky" is not the metaphor you want to use for the Clinton campaign.

Apollo Creed, a black guy, beat Rocky to a pulp. Rocky lost. Intimating the Rocky was a homosexual does not change that reality. Why is it necessary to point this out to allegedly intelligent adults?

Comments

Nope, not conveniently ignoring anything

Count how many times the word "effeminate" is used, versus "weak".

Offline sources concur with this view.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

You are missing the point

perhaps deliberately, I don't know.

The poster brought up the point that Rocky Balboa was a fictional person, which I inferred to mean that somehow the remark is excusable since it refers to a fictional person.

My response was somewhat flip, in that Uncle Tom was a fictional person as well, but a deadly slur, none the less. In a parenthetical aside I commented on the unfortunate meaning of the term, a reference to the fact that the character in the original story is arguably noble and heroic, and not an "Uncle Tom" in the current sense of the term.

I have not backed away from my original post, but simply pointed out that claiming there is an alternate interpretation doesn't help, as the alternate context becomes misogynistic rather than homophobic.

As to reference to Nazis, I assume you refer to my cooment to Easley and his ilk as Vichy Dems, well sorry you didn't like it. Would "collaborator" suit you better? Still has that "Nazi" affiliation though.

Bigotry is about assumed behaviors based on people race, creed or sex. Both uses of "pansy" trade on bigotry, either anti-gay or anti-female.

Sorry, but as I pointed out, using pansy and trying to claim it is inoffensive doesn't work, any more than trying to use the word "tar baby" with the same defense.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Bigotry.

Check the dictionary on bigotry, since we're in the written medium and all. Assumed behaviors based on people race, creed or sex is closest to stereotyping. Then there's prejudice. Then there's bigotry.

Dictionary.com: stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.

AmericanHeritage: One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

Mirriam-Webster: : a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

Bigots do not appoint gay judges and do not include a prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression in the state personnel manual. Bigots are not called allies nor are the ever endorsed by EqualityNC.

Bigots do many things

especially if it serves a purpose beneficial to them. One could say that bigots do not appear in black churches praising MLK, but Bush did it many times.

That aside, I know family members who do not think then have a bigoted bone in their body, who actually hire minorities and treat them well, tell "jokes" using words like "nigger" in them.

You could claim they are not bigoted, but sadly, they are. The use of such language is hurtful, and polarizing, and even when uttered in hushed tones to non-minorities, offensive.

Character is who you are in the dark.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Sigh.

Character is who you are in the dark.

I'll hang that up on the wall in a first-grade classroom. In the meantime, your post was again nonresponsive to the difference between the words stereotyping, prejudice, and bigot.

In response to my posts about why you applied the word "bigot" - a pretty damning term that the dictionaries disagree with your definition on - to specifically the Governor you tell me about your racist family members and George Bush.

The continuing argument by analogy to Uncle Toms, n*word, tar baby, and the Nazi Germans just doesn't work for me here -- the n* word and pansy are WORLDS apart, especially since LOTS of people don't know that pansy has an offensive alternate definition. If you can't respond specifically to the question I'm just going to have to have to assume it's because you can't cobble together a decent answer that's actually responsive.

In any blog discussion

that goes on beyond a certain point, digressions and meta-discussion will occur. Specific digressions will involve how someone has come to form a particular opinion. Meta-discussions will involve specific meanings of words.

Analogy and real-life examples are standard tools in discussion when one is trying to explain a complex concept. We are discussing bigotry, bigoted language and people who don't see their language as bigoted. My personal example was therefore germane to the discussion.

My discussion of the words and phrases such as "Uncle Tom", "tar baby" etc, is also appropriate and germane if you simply go back and read the reason they came up. A poster brushed aside Easley's remark as having been an insult of an fictional characters. I then pointed out that "Uncle Tom" is a fictional character, yet the term is a potent slur even though it involves a fictional character.

You and other posters have argued that "pansy" has two meanings, one derogatory, one more or less benign. I disagree with this view, but offered "tar baby" as a term that has a negative and benign definition in return. Again, a germane point to the discussion at hand.

I have also pointed out to people claiming ignorance of the term's negative connotation that an overwhelming number of sources recognize it in the context I have put forth, including a major pop culture source.

The question was asked whether Easley meant consciously this as a slam against gay people. I don't know, probably not, but it sounds like your typical Freudian slip to me. That aside, even in its secondary connotation, it loses an anti-gay meaning, but acquires an anti-female one.

In any context, it was a stupid thing to say, especially by a "seasoned" politician.

At the risk of being accused of using yet another example you don't approve of, imagine if Easley had referred to Clinton as "My nigga".

"Nigga" has two definitions, one benign ("My close friend"), the other highly offensive.

Which version would African Americans be prone to assume, REGARDLESS of Easly's OBVIOUS context?

As to my discussion of the German government (you, I believe were the first to use the term "Nazi", while I specifically chose the less emotionally-charged "German government"), this came about in reference to why I have a negative view of Easley, Clinton, and all other Dems espousing a "reach across the aisle" mentality, specifically, they are collaborating with the enemy and lending them legitimacy.

This is no longer a matter of "bringing a knife to a gun fight", it has now reached the level of bringing a strongly-worded letter of protest to the St. Valentine's Day Massacre. These people are helping BushCo destroy the country.

Finally, the fact that you don't like my answer, does not mean I haven't answered your question. I addressed directly each point you brought up.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Here is my take on your argument

My discussion of the words and phrases such as "Uncle Tom", "tar baby" etc, is also appropriate and germane if you simply go back and read the reason they came up. A poster brushed aside Easley's remark as having been an insult of an fictional characters. I then pointed out that "Uncle Tom" is a fictional character, yet the term is a potent slur even though it involves a fictional character.

You are missing the obvious counter point to your argument. Calling Rocky a homosexual makes absolutely no sense in that context. Likewise, the term Uncle Tom refers to a character in a novel whose name has become a slur. Last I checked, calling someone Rocky didn't imply any sort of slur. Also, while tar baby may have an acceptable use, I don't think anyone ever thinks of that. They automatically think of the racial slur.

You and other posters have argued that "pansy" has two meanings, one derogatory, one more or less benign. I disagree with this view, but offered "tar baby" as a term that has a negative and benign definition in return. Again, a germane point to the discussion at hand.

Unlike Pansy, tar baby as a slur has a wide cultural base. You will not find a single person who does not think tar baby is a slur. You will find many, probably more so, that view pansy as a benign word.

I have also pointed out to people claiming ignorance of the term's negative connotation that an overwhelming number of sources recognize it in the context I have put forth, including a major pop culture source.

The thing with slang, is that depending on the cultural and social groupings, words taken on entirely different meanings. If you don't believe me, just look up the word peanut butter on urban dictionary. It is also a selective usage of definitions. You can just as easily point to this definition: 5. pansy 91 up, 22 down

someone very pathetic and wimpy, generally used as an insult against both sexes. often confused with fag, sissyand other rather small-minded terms for a homosexual man.

but you don't because it works against your argument.

The question was asked whether Easley meant consciously this as a slam against gay people. I don't know, probably not, but it sounds like your typical Freudian slip to me. That aside, even in its secondary connotation, it loses an anti-gay meaning, but acquires an anti-female one.

Yes, because Governor Easley has this deep down fear and hatred of homosexuals. Likewise, the second definition isn't anti-female. Whether or not you want to accept it, society has a long established and developed idea of gender roles. Yes there are people that break those gender roles every day, but that does not mean those gender roles do not exist. Girls have Barbies and guys have GI Joes. Different is not deficient.

At the risk of being accused of using yet another example you don't approve of, imagine if Easley had referred to Clinton as "My nigga".

"Nigga" has two definitions, one benign ("My close friend"), the other highly offensive.

That word has been long established as a slur. Pansy, as evidence by many people not know about the homosexual aspect of it, does not.

As to my discussion of the German government (you, I believe were the first to use the term "Nazi", while I specifically chose the less emotionally-charged "German government"), this came about in reference to why I have a negative view of Easley, Clinton, and all other Dems espousing a "reach across the aisle" mentality, specifically, they are collaborating with the enemy and lending them legitimacy.

A rose by any other name is still a rose. Just becuase you didn't initial post Nazi, but instead German Government does not mean that the meaning is not there. One isn't going to automatically assume the Holy Roman Empire, especially in a discussion like this.

Oh, and god forbid people work together to get something accomplished. And calling people who have different political views as you "the enemy" is extremely childish and is the mentality that has been destroying politics. There are no goodies and badies. Just people who disagree.

Queer here...

And I voted for Easley 4 years ago. And just days ago, I voted for Hagan and Hillary Clinton.

This topic is almost as stupid as the amount of time people have devoted to debating it...almost

Forgot to add

Did you watch the debate between Hagan and Neal tonight? He totally kicked her butt in every way imaginable. You may be queer, but that doesn't mean you have good judgment.

And as voting for Hillary "We'll Obliterate Iran" Clinton? Maybe you hold stock in defense contractors?

:)

I am amazed this post

has resulted in 80+ comments so far.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

And yet,

the cynical part of me wonders that if the circumstances were reversed and Obama was the one present when the remark was made, you wouldn't be buffing your dudgeon and placing it on the highest shelf possible.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

I'd be just as pissed - and I'd be down at the Obama HQ

telling them exactly what I thought.

But then again - it wasn't Hillary Clinton who said it, was it? It was Easley. He's kind of been on my list for a while. The Mental Health fiasco is just the beginning of tip of the iceberg with him.

And yeah, I voted for him.

It was a good post, and it was important, Kosh. It generated a lot of posts because I can't let something go if I think it's important. My better half can tell you that. I've spent many a night on the couch because of it! : )

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

As an Obama supporter

you can take your cynicism and place it some place else.

Cold cynicism will serve you better

than the "benefit of a doubt" when dealing with politicians.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Pissing on the Democrat establishment parade

And I voted for Easley 4 years ago. And just days ago, I voted for Hagan and Hillary Clinton.

This topic is almost as stupid as the amount of time people have devoted to debating it...almost*NCLawKid

Well! You have proven to be consistent! No doubt you are from the political school of establishment stupidity and a victim of your own stupidity. It apppears that you have piss into the establishment wind and now think it is rain. Have you consider joining the lite wing of the Republican party?

Max, you old dog.

Have you consider joining the lite wing of the Republican party?

Tell Madame Justice to give you an extra hug tonight.

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

Give me a break!

I believe this whole thread is a little over the top. It appears that some are just looking for something over which to cry "foul." I honestly do not think the gov was trying to slam the gays while endorsing Hillary. Give us all a break and cry over something else.

You got it.

25 points for the pun

Persondem is allotted 10 points for the pun and 15 points for the shamelessness of the pun.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-Edmund Burke

Of course he wasn't trying to.

He just did. He didn't have to try to do it; it was unconscious - a tossed off joke.
Doesn't make it right.

And I don't care if any one of you thinks I'm being too sensitive or politically correct about this. I really don't. I don't think I'm right - I know I'm right.

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

It is this nonsense

that causes people to completely turn off when real slurs are used.

We have gone 100% too pc.

Are you nuts?

Wait, I shouldn't say nuts bcaus we all know nuts are a euphamism for testicles and is therefore denigrating to men, but back to the point.

calling someone fat, or pizza face, or any number of insults causes little kids to hide in the bathroom instead of playing outside or eating lunch. That doesn't make them a homophobic slur or pansy for that matter.

nyah. nyah. nyah :) edited

EDIT

That's not true, anyhow. Most of the time the conversation here is well above the standard fare served up on the inter-tubes.

Kosh has backed up his post and his opinion with logic; I've supported him with documentation. Those disagreeing have used anecdotal "I've never used it that way" or "I didn't know that" as evidence that Kosh's assertion was wrong. Oh, I forgot about Rocky Balboa being a fictional character negating Easley's faux pas. That was another failed attempt at arguing this one down.

The word "pansy" has been used as a derogatory term since at least 1929. Easley is old enough and wise enough to have used another word. He's a politician and a lawyer; words are his business. He chose poorly. If he didn't think so then, he knows so now. National media has made note of it.

With that, I bid you good night.

Great job, Kosh.

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

What a break!

I would definitely cry over a break like that! I guess I am a pansy after all.

Ha!

LOL

I needed that. Good one Downtown Charlie.

And welcome. Always happy to have more people who can write complete sentences.

Howdy Doody

The fact that there are multiple meanings for the word "faggot" doesn't excuse its use as a slur.

The Doody family hope to raise profile of faggots

The Doody family from Wolverhampton has been crowned The Faggot Family in a national competition, and to kick off their reign they will launch National Faggot Week.

That line of reasoning need to stop. There are too many words that fall in this category, hence the term "double entendre". From the quicky Wiki:

The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as 'A double meaning; a word or phrase having a double sense, especially as used to convey an indelicate meaning' [emphasis added]. In these cases, the first meaning is presumed to be the more innocent one, while the second meaning is risqué, or at least ironic, requiring the hearer to have some additional knowledge.

Funny picture! Not a good comparison though.

I remembered people snickering in the 5th grade over a story with someone collecting a fagot of wood. There are maybe 7 people alive in America today who don't think that "faggot" is primarily used to refer to homosexuals.

There are lots of full-grown adults on this thread of enlightened non-bigots who had NEVER heard "pansy" used to refer to a homosexual. In this case, it was clearly more susceptible to the non-offensive common usage.

And yet.

The slur is well known enough to be documented in sources such as Merriam-Webster, OED, and other accepted documentarians of language.

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

Once again,

As I have pointed out. Folks can argue that there are two connotations for "pansy", which is true. One of homophobic, the other misogynistic. Both are inappropriate.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Ha!

Very funny.

Oh boy, silly politics time at Blue NC

You're right. Easley should have just called him a wimp. If only to avoid this kind of the-meaning-of-is-is bs.

Can we move on?

But if we move on

I won't be able to start on my second rant, people who were spelling "wimp" with a damned "h" for some reason.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Liberalism as a badge of honor!
No apologies, no excuses.

Thank HEAVENS someone has taken note of this!

Just when I was about to say, 'Oh, I think we're done here," Kosh rallies with this matter of spelling "wimp" with an "h."

Kosh, I'm with ya man. I look at "whimp" and think, 'WHAT?" What the . . . WHY would someone . . .!@#$%^& But you know, for some reason, I am always tempted to spell 'WACKED' with an "h." I think the "h" adds emphasis to the pronunciation, ands extra heft to the word. If I think someone is really far out there, I want to go ahead and add that "h.'

Whew. Glad I got that off my chest.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-Edmund Burke

Well in THAT case

I look just like I sound. Short, frazzled, glasses that don't sit exactly level on my nose, with probably more gray in the brunette than I'm ready to celebrate.

I have no idea what I'm wearing, but I'll be with my Dad, who looks kind of like what John Sununu would look like if he weighed somewhat less and were actually handsome.

This reminds me that I haven't picked up tickets yet. Gotta get that done . . .

Are you going to with a group? How many?

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-Edmund Burke

There will be 3 of us.

I look like my picture, pretty much. On any given day, I can't tell you what the rest of us look like. Seriously.

I don't know how much we'll be able to mix and mingle - we'll be sitting with the dirty unwashed, and there you'll be, mixing with the royalty. I'll pm you my cell number.

Your dad sounds wonderful.

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

I don't look anything like my picture

which closely resembles a plant. It is, in fact, a picture of a plant (though not a flower, as the Colonel, bless his heart, surmised).

My Dad and I will be sitting there staring around us. We both do that in crowds. Very obvious. We just turn and gape and then turn the other way and gape, blinking, sometimes with our mouths hanging open in an unflattering way.

He really is wonderful. He happens to be one of the finest human beings I've ever known, so I feel quite fortunate to have his company for this event.

I don't have a cell, but I think he will have his, so do PM me your number and we'll find each other.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-Edmund Burke

No, I don't think we can.

What do you have to add to this conversation besides "can we move on?" You've only been a member of this blog for 15 minutes, so you're hardly part of "we", you can't be tired of us, so ...what is it that you're tired of? The discussion? Please, click on the track changes link at the top right hand corner of your page, and find another discussion in which to be involved, if you have nothing of value to add to this conversation.

Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi
Pointing at Naked Emperors

Pam's the word

I'll let Pam Spaulding's post at Pandagon have the last word, quoting activist Phil Attey:

The statement was calculated and hateful. Americans over the age of 50 are fully aware that the word “pansy” is that generation’s polite way of publicly saying the word “faggot.” Both Governor Easley and Senator Clinton are of that generation, and both of them know what he meant by the word. This was not a slip of the tongue.

Pages